Fluff tomten skrev 2009-01-23 11:17:50 följande:
Sök på hennes namn
Hm...
"The case of Charles Capel, an old man who wandered off and there was a well-known psychic detective - Noreen Renier - who said that she had solved the case. When you go back and look at it, she didn?t solve the case at all.
But actually in that particular case, the detective did say that in fact, his name is Sergeant Squance. I interviewed Sergeant Squance and I said, ?You are quoted in this article saying that this psychic helped in an investigation.? He said yes. So I said, ?What exactly do you mean by that?? He said, ?Well, when we found the body, some of the stuff she said was right.? I said, ?Hold on here, there are red flags all over the place.? That is not helping an investigation. If that is the criterion for solving a case, then sure psychic detectives are always right. But if your criterion is does this psychic provide specific information that ?leads people to the body,? not afterwards if some parts that are found ?there was a white house somewhere nearby or there was a rock nearby,? wherever else. That?s not psychic information."
Här finns lite mer att läsa om tveksamma fall....
www.csicop.org/si/2005-07/i-files.html
Men penga gärna ut vilket specifikt fall du tänkte på.