Anonym (jury) skrev 2025-05-08 19:27:54 följande:
Trumps exekutiva order 14151 är ju tvärtom så omfattande att den förbjuder varje aktivitet som tidigare var omfattat av DEI program, och detta under vilket som helst namn, dvs. också saker som inte har med anställningar att göra.
Det vore också lite onödigt att komma med en exekutiv order, om denna bara slår fast att något som var olagligt enligt annan federal lagstiftning också är olagligt enligt presidentens exekutiva order.
Jag hittade detta som förklarar en del om 'illegal DEI". Det finns 2 aktuella Executiva ordrar; en verkar vara relaterad mer till att inte slösa skattepengar och resurser, den andra mer om att inte särskilja.
Two Executive Orders in particular ? Executive Order 14151, ?Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferences,? and Executive Order 14173, ?Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,?According to the OPM memorandum, the following activities likely constitute ?illegal DEI?:
?Recruiting, interviewing, hiring, training or other professional development, internships, fellowships, promotion, retention, discipline, and separation, based on protected characteristics like race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, genetic information, or pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition?.?
Diversity requirements ?for the composition of hiring panels, as well as for the composition of candidate pools (also referred to as ?diverse slate? policies).?
Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) ?that . . . advance recruitment, hiring, preferential benefits (including but not limited to training or other career development opportunities), or employee retention agendas based on protected characteristics.?
ERGs that are open only to ?certain racial groups but not others, or only for one sex, or only certain religions but not others.?
Events that limit attendance to only members of an ethnic group, or that permit employees to discourage attendance by those outside the ethnic group.
Social or cultural events or other ?inclusion-related? events or trainings that segregate ?participating employees into separate groups of ?White? and ?People of Color? (or other compositions based upon protected characteristics).?
och förmodligen
Disparate Treatment, including discrimination against applicants or employees on the basis of sex or race;
Harassment, including subjecting employees to ?unwelcome remarks or conduct based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics.?
Limiting, Segregating, and Classifying, including limiting membership in workplace groups to specified individuals or ?separating employees into groups based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic when administering DEI??
Retaliation, including retaliation by an employer ?because an individual has engaged in protected activity under the statute, such as objecting to or opposing employment discrimination related to DEI, participating in employer or EEOC investigations, or filing an EEOC charge.?
mer info här, inklusive vad som fortfarande anses vara laglig DEI:
natlawreview.com/article/trump-administrations-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-dei-executive-orders-brief
