Jimmy75 skrev 2025-06-10 18:52:16 följande:
ClumsySmurf skrev 2025-06-10 18:23:45 följande:
blandar du hop ett påstående om hur något är med ett påstående om varför det är som det är?
Nej, inte jag. Det är just det som är min poäng att det är vanligt här inne att blanda ihop samband med orsak. Det hänvisas inte sällan till statistik som nästan uteslutande är korrelationer, inte orsakssamband.
Det finns en liten korrelation mellan sin egen längd och sitt eget självförtroende , även om påståendet låter något överdrivet så är det fakta att det är vanligare att längre har mer självförtroende, oavsett orsak.
När du blandar ihop detta med ett påstående om t.e.x att det är själva längden som är orsaken till självförtroendet (när det kan vara
den tredje faktorn som är orsaken, som t.e.x mer bekräftelse av andra) är det ju du som blandar ihop något.
"Invisible Scars"
Jag skulle inte bli förvånad om korta män med sämre social kompetens har mer komplex för sin längd än vad korta män med hög social kompetens har, om det går trögt med dejtandet.
Anonym skrev 2025-06-10 14:26:28 följande:
Långa kvinnor, ja och män också för den delen, har ofta större självförtroende och självkänsla än korta personer.
Likaså smala vs feta.
Invisible Scars
Our beliefs shape the reality we experience and hold us captive.
The Dartmouth Scar Experiment: A Brief Overview
In the Dartmouth Scar Experiment, researchers set out to study how people with perceived physical deformities (in this case, a facial scar) believe others view them. Participants were told that they would be given a realistic-looking scar on their face, which was intended to make them feel physically unattractive. In reality, participants were shown the scar in a mirror and then told that makeup would be applied to simulate the scar throughout the experiment. Unbeknownst to the participants, the scar was removed before they interacted with others (Kleck & Strenta, 1980).
The results were striking. Even without a visible scar, participants continued to believe that others were treating them differently due to their perceived deformity. They reported feeling stigmatized, as if people were reacting negatively to their appearance, despite the fact that no scar was present (Kleck & Strenta, 1980).
The results highlight the powerful influence of self-perception and how it can distort our interpretation of the world around us. The implications of this study go beyond physical appearance, offering insight into how our internal beliefs and expectations shape our interactions with others.
Locus of Control: Internal vs. External
The Dartmouth Scar Experiment provides an interesting lens through which to view locus of control. Locus of control refers to an individual's belief about the extent to which they have control over the events in their life. Psychologist Julian Rotter, who developed the concept, categorized it into two types: internal and external (Rotter, 1966).
Internal Locus of Control: People with an internal locus of control believe they are responsible for their successes and failures. They attribute outcomes to their own actions, effort, and decisions. They feel empowered because they believe they can influence their environment and life circumstances.
External Locus of Control: In contrast, those with an external locus of control believe that their life outcomes are determined by external forces, such as fate, luck, or the actions of others. They often feel powerless, as if they are at the mercy of forces beyond their control.
In the context of the Dartmouth Scar Experiment, participants with an external locus of control may have interpreted the perceived negative reactions from others as a reflection of societal bias or ill-treatment, beyond their control. The tendency to externalize responsibility can fuel a self-limiting victim mentality-a belief that one is helpless in the face of life?s challenges.
www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-school-walls/202410/invisible-scars