Digestive skrev 2023-03-11 13:04:49 följande:
Och exakt vart skulle FOX och/eller Tucker Carlson påstå någonting sådant? Du hittar verkligen på för hela slanten.
Det är en avlägsen pod och ämnet är även dolt för någon som vill söka sig till det i Public Service. På plats 21 hamnar USApoden den här veckan med en teknisk räckvidd på 81 095.
"
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on March 6 aired newly released security video from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol that he said was provided to him by Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.
Carlson used the footage to falsely portray the riot as a peaceful gathering and to continue pushing long-debunked claims, including that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.
"More than 40,000 hours of surveillance footage from in or around the Capitol have been withheld from the public. And once you see the video, you’ll understand why," Carlson said at the start of the segment. "Taken as a whole, the video record does not support the claim that January 6th was an insurrection. In fact, it demolishes that claim."
...
Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger denounced Carlson’s segment in an internal memo, saying that the opinion program "aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack." He also said "Tucker Carlson Tonight" didn’t reach out to the department "to provide accurate context."
...
Claim: "The protesters believed that the election they had just voted in had been unfairly conducted, and they were right. In retrospect, it is clear the 2020 election was a grave betrayal of American democracy." — Carlson
---
Allegations of a rigged election have been refuted by audits, judges, federal agencies, state election officials and technology experts, as well as officials and advisers in Trump’s administration.
...
Claim: "These were not insurrectionists, they were sightseers." — Carlson
This is another Pants on Fire claim. Rioters attacked police, smashed windows, broke doors and ransacked offices. They chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" and caused the House and Senate to shut down for several hours.
The video footage Carlson aired showed only parts of the events at the Capitol that day.
"The program conveniently cherry-picked from the calmer moments of our 41,000 hours of video," Manger, the Capitol Police chief, said in the memo. "The commentary fails to provide context about the chaos and violence that happened before or during these less tense moments."
According to the Justice Department, 140 officers were assaulted at the Capitol that day, including 60 Metropolitan Police officers and 80 Capitol Police officers.
Claim: Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell refused "repeated requests" by the Capitol Police chief "for backup, for the National Guard." — Miranda Devine, New York Post reporter
We’ve rated similar claims False. There is no evidence that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, or any other member of Congress, refused enhanced security requests for Jan. 6.
Previous claims have said that Trump authorized 10,000 or 20,000 National Guard troops (the number depending on the claimant) to protect the Capitol and that Pelosi "rejected" it. But we found no record of any such authorization being made, or of Pelosi impeding it. The D.C. National Guard reports "solely to the president of the United States," per its website.
"The Speaker of the House doesn’t have the power to do this," Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff Drew Hammill told PolitiFact in June. "No request was made for the National Guard before Jan. 6."
"No congressional official, or body, has the authority to activate the National Guard to the U.S. Capitol. Only the president," Jane. L Campbell, president and CEO of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, also said in June.
Claim: Capitol Police officers "helped" QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley and "acted as his tour guides." — Carlson
Like similar claims, we rated this Pants on Fire! Chansley was among the first rioters to force their way into the building through a door broken by other rioters. Officers repeatedly asked Chansley to leave the building. This is corroborated by the plea agreement Chansley signed and an officer’s account of the events.
Manger called Carlson’s claim "outrageous and false," and said officers used de-escalation tactics to try to talk rioters into getting each other to leave the Capitol.
Claim: Video shows the media lied about Brian Sicknick’s manner of death. — Carlson
This is misleading. Sicknick, a 42-year-old Capitol Police officer, died the day after the Jan. 6 assault. Initial news reports, citing law enforcement sources, said he had been struck on the head with a fire extinguisher. Follow-up coverage challenged that, saying he had been sprayed with a form of mace, and that the cause of death remained unclear.
On April 19, 2021, the medical examiner, Dr. Francisco J. Diaz, determined that Sicknick died from two strokes at the base of his brain caused by a blood clot. Diaz told The Washington Post that there were no signs of injury or evidence that Sicknick had an allergic reaction to irritants, and that Sicknick died of natural causes.
But Diaz also noted that Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said "all that transpired played a role in his condition."
In Carlson’s attempt to vilify the media, he also used new video to support his argument that the riot wasn’t that violent and to undermine the details about Sicknick’s death.
...
Meanwhile, two rioters, Julian Khater and Geroge Tanios, pleaded guilty to crimes related to the pepper spray attack against Sicknick, though neither were accused of killing him. Khater, who used the spray, is currently serving six years in prison, and Tanios was released after spending five months in jail.
In his March 7 memo, Manger, the Capitol Police chief, called Carlson’s treatment of the Sicknick footage "the most disturbing accusation from last night."
...
Claim: "I remember asking reporters at the time, you know, why do you keep calling these people ‘armed insurrectionists’ when there's no evidence that anybody used any arms against it? And they said, ‘Well, they had flagpoles.’ So it’s because people were walking around with American flags that made them ‘armed insurrections.’" — Charles Hurt, Washington Times
There were multiple rioters armed on Jan. 6 and we’ve rated claims stating otherwise False.
Court documents, video evidence and news coverage directly contradict this characterization and show that several rioters on the Capitol grounds had firearms and dozens more wielded knives, bats and other real and makeshift weapons including flagpoles, fire extinguishers, skateboards and chemical sprays.
..
...
"
